By Ilan Peleg
This ebook explores alternative routes of fixing political conflicts among ethnic teams in deeply divided societies. via an in depth research of 14 varied international locations in Africa, Asia, Europe, North the US, and the center East, Peleg creates a framework that may enable humanity to maneuver towards an answer to a couple of the bloodiest conflicts in background. Long-lasting recommendations can't be stumbled on through basically granting members equivalent rights, yet by means of spotting the rights of specific teams. This e-book examines crucial political and moral factor of the modern international: the way forward for deeply divided societies ruled by means of ethnic politics.
Read or Download Democratizing hegemonic state PDF
Best war & peace books
Why are a few areas vulnerable to struggle whereas others stay at peace? What stipulations reason areas to maneuver from peace to warfare and vice versa? This e-book deals a singular theoretical reason for the diversities in degrees of and transitions among conflict and peace. the writer distinguishes among "hot" and "cold" results, looking on depth of the struggle or the peace, after which makes use of 3 key ideas (state, country, and the overseas procedure) to argue that it's the particular stability among states and countries in numerous areas that determines the new or hot results: the reduce the stability, the better the struggle proneness of the area, whereas the better the stability, the hotter the peace.
In line with newly declassified files, this e-book deals a provocative new research of President Jimmy Carter's political position in Arab-Israeli international relations. It analyzes the reflexive dating among family politics and overseas coverage, in particular the jobs performed by means of the media, public opinion and pro-Israel foyer teams.
Ranging from the occasions surrounding the 1st global struggle, the writer lines the heritage of the fashionable center East and places the Arab Spring into context. McMillan breaks down the nuances of Western involvement within the heart East, alliances and divisions among heart jap peoples and international locations, and the function of faith in those conflicts.
Palestine is usually seen, from afar, in the course of the body of insurmountable distinction and violent clash alongside spiritual and ethnic traces. Julia Droeber appears past this, as she attracts out the way sameness and distinction is built and handled within the daily relationships and practices of alternative non secular groups within the West financial institution city of Nablus.
- The Political Economy of EU Ties with Iraq and Iran: An Assessment of the Trade-Peace Relationship
- Partitions: Reshaping States and Minds (Routledge Studies in Geopolitics)
- International Multiparty Mediation and Conflict Management: Challenges of Cooperation and Coordination
- Conflicts in the Persian Gulf: Origins and Evolution
- The war over perpetual peace
Additional info for Democratizing hegemonic state
These types of what might be called “majority prerogatives” are normatively acceptable in liberal democracies. Coercive actions designed to assimilate ethnic minorities, particularly indigenous nonimmigrant minorities, are hegemonic and nondemocratic in nature. Although the boundary between the democratically acceptable and the hegemonically unacceptable is not always clear, the distinction is nevertheless important. ” The Russiﬁcation policy carried out by czars and Commissars alike, and the Turkiﬁcation policy since Ataturk fall under the same category.
In this island nation, the Sinhalese majority initiated government-sponsored migration into traditional Tamil areas, instituted its language as the exclusive ofﬁcial language of the country, and conferred a special status on its religion, Buddhism (Kearney 1985). A bloody civil war has been fought for decades as a result of such hegemonic behavior. A more recent and by now better-known example of the relationships between hegemonic behavior and bloody conﬂict is the history of Serbian policy during the 1990s.
The level of “neutrality” of liberal democracies cannot be assumed; it must be examined. 3. Although liberal democrats argue that group rights threaten equality and liberty, in all Western democracies group rights “work within the constraints of liberal democratic constitutions” (Kymlicka 2002, 25). This means that individuals are protected from overzealous minorities even if these minorities enjoy group rights. The last point is extremely important for the overall thesis of this volume. , individual equality) but, at the same time, adopt provisions that allow for group rights.