Download Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing: by Sylvain Kahane (auth.), Alexander Gelbukh (eds.) PDF

By Sylvain Kahane (auth.), Alexander Gelbukh (eds.)

CICLing 2001 is the second one annual convention on clever textual content processing and Computational Linguistics (hence the identify CICLing), see it really is meant to supply a balanced view of the innovative advancements in either theoretical foundations of computational linguistics and perform of usual language textual content processing with its a number of functions. A characteristic of the CICLing meetings is their huge scope that covers approximately all components of computational linguistics and all facets of traditional language processing purposes. The convention is a discussion board for discussion among the experts operating in those components. This yr our invited audio system have been Graeme Hirst (U. Toronto, Canada), Sylvain Kahane (U. Paris 7, France), and Ruslan Mitkov (U. Wolverhampton, UK). They added first-class prolonged lectures and arranged vibrant discussions. a complete of seventy two submissions have been acquired, all yet only a few of strangely prime quality. After cautious reviewing, this system Committee chosen for presentation fifty three of them, forty-one as complete papers and 12 as brief papers, via ninety eight authors from 19 international locations: Spain (19 authors), Japan (15), united states (12), France, Mexico (9 each), Sweden (6), Canada, China, Germany, Italy, Malaysia, Russia, United Arab Emirates (3 each), Argentina (2), Bulgaria, The Netherlands, Ukraine, united kingdom, and Uruguay (1 each).

Show description

Read or Download Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing: Second International Conference, CICLing 2001 Mexico City, Mexico, February 18–24, 2001 Proceedings PDF

Best linguistics books

Is That a Fish in Your Ear?: Translation and the Meaning of Everything

A brand new York instances amazing ebook for 2011
One of The Economist's 2011 Books of the Year

People communicate assorted languages, and constantly have. the traditional Greeks took no observe of something except it used to be acknowledged in Greek; the Romans made every person converse Latin; and in India, humans realized their neighbors' languages—as did many traditional Europeans in occasions earlier (Christopher Columbus knew Italian, Portuguese, and Castilian Spanish in addition to the classical languages). yet this present day, all of us use translation to deal with the variety of languages. with no translation there will be no global information, now not a lot of a examining checklist in any topic at school, no fix manuals for autos or planes; we wouldn't also be capable of prepare flat-pack furniture.

Is Fish on your Ear? levels around the entire of human event, from overseas movies to philosophy, to teach why translation is on the middle of what we do and who we're. between many different issues, David Bellos asks: What's the variation among translating unprepared usual speech and translating Madame Bovary? How do you translate a funny story? What's the variation among a local tongue and a discovered one? are you able to translate among any pair of languages, or in simple terms among a few? What rather is going on while international leaders communicate on the UN? Can machines ever substitute human translators, and if now not, why?

But the largest query Bellos asks is that this: How can we ever particularly comprehend that we've understood what anyone else says—in our personal language or in one other? unbelievable, witty, and written with nice joie de vivre, this publication is all approximately how we understand people and exhibits us how, eventually, translation is one other identify for the human .

A Grammar of Chukchi

The purpose of this paintings is to provide the 1st fieldwork-based, typologically knowledgeable reference grammar of Chukchi, an indigenous language of the north-eastern nook of the Russian Federation. The theoretical strategy is low-key and eclectic; linguistic phenomena are defined in a fashion that's, in as far as it really is attainable, theory-neutral, even though the place a department of linguistic thought presents instruments which enable transparent and easy description it truly is used with out hesitation.

Extra info for Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing: Second International Conference, CICLing 2001 Mexico City, Mexico, February 18–24, 2001 Proceedings

Example text

1994) 3. : Studies in Lexical Relations. MIT Dissertation, Cambridge, MA, USA (1965) 4. : The Case for Case. In E. Bach & R. , Universals in linguistic theory. New York: Holt, Rinehardt & Winston (1968) 1-88 5. : The Role of Theory in Linguistic Analysis: The Spanish Pronoun System. North Holland Publishing Company: The Netherlands (1975) 6. : Paquetes de Clíticos del Español: Cálculo de la Correlación entre Roles Semánticos y Propiedades Morfológicas e Implementación en una Gramática Categorial de Unificación.

Other case of extraction cannot be developed here but we hope that we have convinced the reader that they can be described exactly in the same way. 4 Comparison with Other Formalisms In our analysis, the nominal nucleus is promoted from its syntactic governor to the verbal nucleus. For instance, in the analysis of (3), the nominal nucleus sur le mari de laquelle does not depend on compter but on the verbal nucleus pense que (tu) peux compter. In terms of immediate constituents, we see that the projection of the verbal nucleus dominates directly the projection of the nominal nucleus (= the extracted phrase) and the projection of the main verb (the clause with a gap).

A nodal structure indicates the subcategorization pattern of a lexical unit, while a sagittal structure indicates the properties of a syntactic relation, such as linearization or agreement. Although our formalism is different from traditional MTT formalism ([18]), a sagittal structure is equivalent to an MTT surface syntactic correspondence rule. 5 A linearly ordered tree is said projective if no dependencies cross each other and no dependency covers the root. A Fully Lexicalized Grammar for French Based on Meaning-Text Theory AVOIR(V)ind sujet + aux (N) (V) (V)part_p AVOIR(V)ind (V) sujet -10 + aux +5 () (V) → 23 -10 sujet (N) aux +5 (V)part_p Fig.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.09 of 5 – based on 28 votes